Is Obsidian Web Clipper Safe? — Extension Safety Profile
Quick verdict: Obsidian Web Clipper earns a safety grade A, 86 out of 100, based on 5 of 5 dimensions.
86/100
Grade A · 5 of 5 checks
What we found
Automated safety profile from public signals (the extension's manifest & permissions, store listing, publisher, privacy policy). A full review hasn't been published yet.
What this safety grade means
Obsidian Web Clipper earns a safety grade of A (86/100), measured across 5 of 5 dimensions. Its strongest area is Maintenance & Ownership (100%). The weakest is Publisher & Identity (60%) — what holds its grade back the most.
On the public records we can check, Obsidian Web Clipper comes through cleanly. 800,000 active users/installs reported on the store. Store rating 4.8/5 from 525 user ratings. Last updated on the store 2026-06-16. This is an automated profile, not a hands-on review — so treat the grade as a starting point: open Obsidian Web Clipper's own store listing and privacy policy before installing, and weigh it against the other screenshots & screen recording extensions we track below.
Safety Signals
Based on 5 of 5 safety dimensions
| Dimension | Score | Bar | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Publisher & Identity | 60% · 4.8/8 pts 2 of 5 checks verified | Automated signals | |
| Permissions & Access | 83% · 20.8/25 pts 3 of 3 checks verified | Automated signals | |
| Data & Privacy | 93% · 14.8/16 pts 4 of 5 checks verified | Automated signals | |
| Maintenance & Ownership | 100% · 7.5/7.5 pts 1 of 2 checks verified | Automated signals | |
| Community Reputation | 93% · 9.3/10 pts 2 of 4 checks verified | Automated signals |
In-depth safety analysis
This extension requests broad permissions typical of a web clipper. The host access combined with scripting and activeTab allows it to read and modify content on any website you visit, which is necessary to capture page elements, text, or screenshots for saving to Obsidian. The clipboardWrite permission lets it copy clipped content, while storage saves your settings. The declarativeNetRequest permission is less common for a clipper but can be used to modify network requests, potentially to assist with clipping or bypass certain page restrictions. Overall, the scope is expected for a tool that needs to interact with arbitrary web pages, though the network request capability adds a layer of power that a careful user should note.
For any extension in the screenshots or screen recording category, it’s wise to be aware that it can access sensitive information displayed on your screen, including private messages, financial data, or passwords if you clip from those pages. Always verify that you trust the publisher, as malicious or compromised extensions in this category could capture and exfiltrate your data. The developer declares collecting location data, so you may want to review why that is needed for a clipping tool. The extension’s privacy practices state data is not sold or used for unrelated purposes, which is a positive sign.
The fact sheet shows a strong Maintenance & Ownership score (100%), indicating the extension is actively updated and likely from a well-established source—in this case, the official Obsidian team. The weakest dimension is Publisher & Identity (60%), which suggests that while the publisher is known, some identity verification aspects may not be fully maximized, but this is not unusual for smaller companies. Combined with a high community reputation and data privacy score, the overall profile is reassuring for users who already trust the Obsidian ecosystem.
AI-assisted analysis of the documented signals above (permissions, store data, privacy practices) — explains what they mean and the risks typical for this category. Not a hands-on test.
What the store listing shows
Who's Behind Obsidian Web Clipper?
- Publisher obsidian.md
Public records identify the publisher, but no individual founders or a separate registered company are named — which is what holds the Publisher & Identity score back. Less public information about who operates an extension means less you can verify about their long-term accountability.
How it compares
Among the 7 Screenshots & Screen Recording extensions we track, Obsidian Web Clipper scores higher on safety than 71% of them.
Computed from our own database of assessed Screenshots & Screen Recording extensions — updated as we track more.
Evidence on File (12)
Obsidian Web Clipper FAQ
- Is Obsidian Web Clipper safe?
- Obsidian Web Clipper earns a safety grade of A (86/100) on our evidence-based assessment, based on 5 of 5 safety dimensions we could verify from public records. This is an automated profile built from public records, not a hands-on review.
- Who is behind Obsidian Web Clipper?
- Obsidian Web Clipper is operated by obsidian.md.
Alternatives we track
Browse all browser extensions we've checked → · Best Screenshots & Screen Recording extensions