Is YouTube Repeat Safe? — Extension Safety Profile

Quick verdict: YouTube Repeat earns a safety grade B, 78.6 out of 100, based on 5 of 5 dimensions.

B

78.6/100

Grade B · 5 of 5 checks


What we found

· Data updated

Automated safety profile from public signals (the extension's manifest & permissions, store listing, publisher, privacy policy). A full review hasn't been published yet.

What this safety grade means

YouTube Repeat earns a safety grade of B (78.6/100), measured across 5 of 5 dimensions. Its strongest area is Data & Privacy (100%). The weakest is Publisher & Identity (60%) — what holds its grade back the most.

On the public records we can check, YouTube Repeat looks broadly trustworthy. 10,000 active users/installs reported on the store. Store rating 4.6/5 from 37 user ratings. Last updated on the store 2025-12-05. This is an automated profile, not a hands-on review — so treat the grade as a starting point: open YouTube Repeat's own store listing and privacy policy before installing, and weigh it against the other browser extensions we track below.

Safety Signals

Based on 5 of 5 safety dimensions

DimensionScoreBarSource
Publisher & Identity 60% · 4.8/8 pts 2 of 5 checks verified Automated signals
Permissions & Access 75% · 18.7/25 pts 3 of 3 checks verified Automated signals
Data & Privacy 100% · 16/16 pts 4 of 5 checks verified Automated signals
Maintenance & Ownership 60% · 4.5/7.5 pts 1 of 2 checks verified Automated signals
Community Reputation 83% · 8.3/10 pts 2 of 4 checks verified Automated signals

In-depth safety analysis

This extension requests the "storage" permission to save your settings locally, and host access to https://*/*, which allows it to read and alter content on any HTTPS website you visit. For a tool that adds repeat controls to YouTube, some access to youtube.com is expected—but the blanket host permission goes far beyond its stated purpose, meaning the extension can technically interact with every secure page in your browser.

When an extension asks for broad host access, a careful user should know that the capability is not limited to a single site. Even well-intentioned tools can later be sold, updated, or compromised, potentially exposing browsing activity across unrelated websites. In this category, it is wise to check whether a single-site utility truly needs to run everywhere, and to review permissions after updates. The privacy declarations here are promising, but they remain self-reported and unverified.

In this assessment, the strongest dimension is Data & Privacy, where the developer has declared no data selling and no use for unrelated purposes—a positive sign. The weakest dimension is Publisher & Identity, reflecting limited public information about the developer. For users, this balance suggests the extension states good privacy intentions, but the lesser-known publisher and broad permissions warrant a closer look before continuous use.

AI-assisted analysis of the documented signals above (permissions, store data, privacy practices) — explains what they mean and the risks typical for this category. Not a hands-on test.

What the store listing shows

YouTube Repeat listing on the Chrome Web Store
YouTube Repeat on the Chrome Web Store, captured 2026-10-12. View the live listing ↗

Who's Behind YouTube Repeat?

  • Publisher Milext.com

Public records identify the publisher, but no individual founders or a separate registered company are named — which is what holds the Publisher & Identity score back. Less public information about who operates an extension means less you can verify about their long-term accountability.

How it compares

Among the 838 browser extensions we track, YouTube Repeat scores higher on safety than 59% of them.

Computed from our own database of assessed browser extensions — updated as we track more.

Evidence on File (12)

Founder public: Publisher publicly identified: Milext.com (individual founders not separately named).
Our reports database · Captured 2026-10-09
Registered company: Milext.com.
Our reports database · Captured 2026-10-09
Data collection scope: Developer lists no user-data categories collected on the store privacy disclosure.
Source: milext.com ↗ · Captured 2026-10-09
Data not sold: Developer declares on the Chrome Web Store that your data is not sold to third parties.
Source: milext.com ↗ · Captured 2026-10-09
Data use limited: Developer declares data isn't used for unrelated purposes or to determine creditworthiness/lending.
Source: milext.com ↗ · Captured 2026-10-09
Privacy policy present: A privacy policy is linked from the store listing: https://milext.com/privacy-policy/
Source: milext.com ↗ · Captured 2026-10-09
High-capability permissions: Requests no high-capability permissions in its manifest.
Website access scope: Requests access to ALL websites you visit (https://*/*) — broad for what this extension does.
Manifest version: Built on Manifest V3 (the modern, more sandboxed permission model).
Last updated recency: Last updated on the store 2025-12-05.
Store rating: Store rating 4.6/5 from 37 user ratings.
Store users: 10,000 active users/installs reported on the store.

YouTube Repeat FAQ

Is YouTube Repeat safe?
YouTube Repeat earns a safety grade of B (78.6/100) on our evidence-based assessment, based on 5 of 5 safety dimensions we could verify from public records. This is an automated profile built from public records, not a hands-on review.
Who is behind YouTube Repeat?
YouTube Repeat is operated by Milext.com.

Browse all browser extensions we've checked →

Share 𝕏 Reddit Facebook

Cite this profile: Is YouTube Repeat safe? — ExtensionTrust. ExtensionTrust. https://extensiontrust.com/tool/youtube-repeat/

Get browser-extension safety alerts