Is Webpage to Markdown Safe? — Extension Safety Profile

Quick verdict: Webpage to Markdown earns a safety grade A, 85.3 out of 100, based on 5 of 5 dimensions.

A

85.3/100

Grade A · 5 of 5 checks


What we found

· Data updated

Automated safety profile from public signals (the extension's manifest & permissions, store listing, publisher, privacy policy). A full review hasn't been published yet.

What this safety grade means

Webpage to Markdown earns a safety grade of A (85.3/100), measured across 5 of 5 dimensions. Its strongest area is Data & Privacy (93%). The weakest is Publisher & Identity (60%) — what holds its grade back the most.

On the public records we can check, Webpage to Markdown comes through cleanly. 20,000 active users/installs reported on the store. Store rating 4.5/5 from 26 user ratings. Last updated on the store 2025-12-21. This is an automated profile, not a hands-on review — so treat the grade as a starting point: open Webpage to Markdown's own store listing and privacy policy before installing, and weigh it against the other browser extensions we track below.

Safety Signals

Based on 5 of 5 safety dimensions

DimensionScoreBarSource
Publisher & Identity 60% · 4.8/8 pts 2 of 5 checks verified Automated signals
Permissions & Access 90% · 22.5/25 pts 3 of 3 checks verified Automated signals
Data & Privacy 93% · 14.8/16 pts 4 of 5 checks verified Automated signals
Maintenance & Ownership 85% · 6.4/7.5 pts 1 of 2 checks verified Automated signals
Community Reputation 83% · 8.3/10 pts 2 of 4 checks verified Automated signals

In-depth safety analysis

This extension requests the activeTab, scripting, and storage permissions. The activeTab and scripting combination lets it read and manipulate the content of the current page only when you actively invoke the extension—which is exactly what a webpage-to-Markdown converter needs to scrape text and formatting. The storage permission is used to save local settings. This scope is normal and expected for a page-conversion tool.

General-purpose browser extensions that process page content carry a few typical considerations. Any extension with page access could technically capture content you view; a careful user might avoid activating it on sites containing highly sensitive information unless they trust the developer’s data handling. The developer-declared privacy practices state that website content is collected, but also that data is not sold, not used for unrelated purposes, and not used for creditworthiness—a strong and favorable signal, reflected in the extension’s highest score in Data & Privacy (93%).

The weakest dimension is Publisher & Identity (60%). While the extension is published under a clear name (chr0mekitdev) and has 20,000 users with a good rating, the lower score typically indicates limited public information about the developer and a relatively small number of ratings. This is not uncommon for a lightweight utility, but it does mean users have less contextual assurance about long-term trustworthiness. Combined with the robust privacy declarations, a cautious evaluation could involve checking if the extension sends data externally (not indicated here) or simply converts content locally.

AI-assisted analysis of the documented signals above (permissions, store data, privacy practices) — explains what they mean and the risks typical for this category. Not a hands-on test.

What the store listing shows

Webpage to Markdown listing on the Chrome Web Store
Webpage to Markdown on the Chrome Web Store, captured 2026-06-27. View the live listing ↗

Who's Behind Webpage to Markdown?

  • Publisher chr0mekitdev

Public records identify the publisher, but no individual founders or a separate registered company are named — which is what holds the Publisher & Identity score back. Less public information about who operates an extension means less you can verify about their long-term accountability.

How it compares

Among the 838 browser extensions we track, Webpage to Markdown scores higher on safety than 84% of them.

Computed from our own database of assessed browser extensions — updated as we track more.

Evidence on File (12)

Founder public: Publisher publicly identified: chr0mekitdev (individual founders not separately named).
Our reports database · Captured 2026-06-23
Registered company: chr0mekitdev.
Our reports database · Captured 2026-06-23
Data collection scope: Developer discloses collecting 1 data category (Website content).
Source: chr0mekitdev.github.io ↗ · Captured 2026-06-23
Data not sold: Developer declares on the Chrome Web Store that your data is not sold to third parties.
Source: chr0mekitdev.github.io ↗ · Captured 2026-06-23
Data use limited: Developer declares data isn't used for unrelated purposes or to determine creditworthiness/lending.
Source: chr0mekitdev.github.io ↗ · Captured 2026-06-23
Privacy policy present: A privacy policy is linked from the store listing: https://chr0mekitdev.github.io/privacy-policy/
Source: chr0mekitdev.github.io ↗ · Captured 2026-06-23
High-capability permissions: Requests 1 high-capability permission(s): scripting.
Website access scope: Requests no host access — cannot read or change data on the websites you visit.
Manifest version: Built on Manifest V3 (the modern, more sandboxed permission model).
Last updated recency: Last updated on the store 2025-12-21.
Store rating: Store rating 4.5/5 from 26 user ratings.
Store users: 20,000 active users/installs reported on the store.

Webpage to Markdown FAQ

Is Webpage to Markdown safe?
Webpage to Markdown earns a safety grade of A (85.3/100) on our evidence-based assessment, based on 5 of 5 safety dimensions we could verify from public records. This is an automated profile built from public records, not a hands-on review.
Who is behind Webpage to Markdown?
Webpage to Markdown is operated by chr0mekitdev.

Browse all browser extensions we've checked →

Share 𝕏 Reddit Facebook

Cite this profile: Is Webpage to Markdown safe? — ExtensionTrust. ExtensionTrust. https://extensiontrust.com/tool/webpage-to-markdown/

Get browser-extension safety alerts