Is Simple Color Picker Safe? — Extension Safety Profile

Quick verdict: Simple Color Picker earns a safety grade B, 78.2 out of 100, based on 5 of 5 dimensions.

B

78.2/100

Grade B · 5 of 5 checks


What we found

Color Pickers & Eyedroppers · Data updated

Automated safety profile from public signals (the extension's manifest & permissions, store listing, publisher, privacy policy). A full review hasn't been published yet.

What this safety grade means

Simple Color Picker earns a safety grade of B (78.2/100), measured across 5 of 5 dimensions. Its strongest area is Permissions & Access (100%). The weakest is Maintenance & Ownership (10%) — what holds its grade back the most.

On the public records we can check, Simple Color Picker looks broadly trustworthy. 10,000 active users/installs reported on the store. Store rating 5.0/5 from 16 user ratings. Last updated on the store 2023-03-22. This is an automated profile, not a hands-on review — so treat the grade as a starting point: open Simple Color Picker's own store listing and privacy policy before installing, and weigh it against the other color pickers & eyedroppers extensions we track below.

Safety Signals

Based on 5 of 5 safety dimensions

DimensionScoreBarSource
Publisher & Identity 60% · 4.8/8 pts 2 of 5 checks verified Automated signals
Permissions & Access 100% · 25/25 pts 3 of 3 checks verified Automated signals
Data & Privacy 83% · 13.2/16 pts 4 of 5 checks verified Automated signals
Maintenance & Ownership 10% · 0.8/7.5 pts 1 of 2 checks verified Automated signals
Community Reputation 83% · 8.3/10 pts 2 of 4 checks verified Automated signals

In-depth safety analysis

This extension’s requested permissions are minimal for a color picker — typically just access to the active tab when you click the icon, and local storage to save picked colors. That’s reflected in the perfect Permissions & Access score of 100%, meaning it asks for nothing beyond what’s needed to sample pixels from the page you’re viewing. For an eyedropper tool, this scope is exactly normal and expected.

In this category, general risks are low, but a careful user should know that any extension with activeTab permission can technically read the current page’s content when activated. That access is limited to the moment you click it. Always prefer tools that avoid broad permissions like “read all websites” or access to browsing history, and be cautious of copycat extensions that mimic popular simple tools but request more than they need.

The strongest dimension here is permissions handling, while the weakest is maintenance and ownership. The extension hasn’t been updated since March 2023, which gives it a low Maintenance & Ownership score of 10%. Without recent updates, an extension may eventually break on newer browser versions or miss security patches. Publisher identity information is also somewhat limited (60%), so you have less visibility into who maintains it. The declared privacy practices and user ratings are positive, but the update gap is worth noting for long-term use.

AI-assisted analysis of the documented signals above (permissions, store data, privacy practices) — explains what they mean and the risks typical for this category. Not a hands-on test.

What the store listing shows

Simple Color Picker listing on the Chrome Web Store
Simple Color Picker on the Chrome Web Store, captured 2026-06-20. View the live listing ↗

Who's Behind Simple Color Picker?

  • Publisher Ezhil

Public records identify the publisher, but no individual founders or a separate registered company are named — which is what holds the Publisher & Identity score back. Less public information about who operates an extension means less you can verify about their long-term accountability.

How it compares

Among the 6 Color Pickers & Eyedroppers extensions we track, Simple Color Picker scores higher on safety than 17% of them.

Computed from our own database of assessed Color Pickers & Eyedroppers extensions — updated as we track more.

Evidence on File (12)

Founder public: Publisher publicly identified: Ezhil (individual founders not separately named).
Our reports database · Captured 2026-06-19
Registered company: Ezhil.
Our reports database · Captured 2026-06-19
Data collection scope: Developer lists no user-data categories collected on the store privacy disclosure.
Data not sold: Developer declares on the Chrome Web Store that your data is not sold to third parties.
Data use limited: Developer declares data isn't used for unrelated purposes or to determine creditworthiness/lending.
Privacy policy present: No privacy policy is linked from the store listing.
High-capability permissions: Requests no high-capability permissions in its manifest.
Website access scope: Requests no host access — cannot read or change data on the websites you visit.
Manifest version: Built on Manifest V3 (the modern, more sandboxed permission model).
Last updated recency: Last updated on the store 2023-03-22.
Store rating: Store rating 5.0/5 from 16 user ratings.
Store users: 10,000 active users/installs reported on the store.

Simple Color Picker FAQ

Is Simple Color Picker safe?
Simple Color Picker earns a safety grade of B (78.2/100) on our evidence-based assessment, based on 5 of 5 safety dimensions we could verify from public records. This is an automated profile built from public records, not a hands-on review.
Who is behind Simple Color Picker?
Simple Color Picker is operated by Ezhil.

Alternatives we track

Browse all browser extensions we've checked → · Best Color Pickers & Eyedroppers extensions

Share 𝕏 Reddit Facebook

Cite this profile: Is Simple Color Picker safe? — ExtensionTrust. ExtensionTrust. https://extensiontrust.com/tool/simple-color-picker/

Get browser-extension safety alerts