Is Selection Reader (Text to Speech) Safe? — Extension Safety Profile

Quick verdict: Selection Reader (Text to Speech) earns a safety grade A, 84.8 out of 100, based on 5 of 5 dimensions.

A

84.8/100

Grade A · 5 of 5 checks


What we found

· Data updated

Automated safety profile from public signals (the extension's manifest & permissions, store listing, publisher, privacy policy). A full review hasn't been published yet.

What this safety grade means

Selection Reader (Text to Speech) earns a safety grade of A (84.8/100), measured across 5 of 5 dimensions. Its strongest area is Maintenance & Ownership (100%). The weakest is Publisher & Identity (60%) — what holds its grade back the most.

On the public records we can check, Selection Reader (Text to Speech) comes through cleanly. 200,000 active users/installs reported on the store. Store rating 4.2/5 from 730 user ratings. Last updated on the store 2026-09-07. This is an automated profile, not a hands-on review — so treat the grade as a starting point: open Selection Reader (Text to Speech)'s own store listing and privacy policy before installing, and weigh it against the other browser extensions we track below.

Safety Signals

Based on 5 of 5 safety dimensions

DimensionScoreBarSource
Publisher & Identity 60% · 4.8/8 pts 2 of 5 checks verified Automated signals
Permissions & Access 90% · 22.5/25 pts 3 of 3 checks verified Automated signals
Data & Privacy 83% · 13.2/16 pts 4 of 5 checks verified Automated signals
Maintenance & Ownership 100% · 7.5/7.5 pts 1 of 2 checks verified Automated signals
Community Reputation 84% · 8.4/10 pts 2 of 4 checks verified Automated signals

In-depth safety analysis

This extension requests permissions that are typical for a text-to-speech tool. The activeTab and scripting permissions let it read selected text from the current page only when you trigger it, such as via the right-click context menu. The tts permission uses Chrome’s built-in speech engine to speak that text aloud locally, without sending it to any remote server. The storage permission saves your preferences, and alarms can schedule tasks. This scope is expected for a selection reader and does not grant broad, always-on access to your browsing.

For any general browser extension that can read page content, a careful user should consider that it could technically access sensitive text visible on the active tab when invoked. Because this extension relies on the local text-to-speech engine rather than a cloud service, your selected text stays on your device, which is a privacy advantage. As with all extensions, it is wise to install only from sources you trust and to be aware that future updates could change behavior, even if the current version appears safe.

The fact sheet shows a strong Maintenance & Ownership score, indicating the extension is actively maintained and ownership is clear. The weakest dimension is Publisher & Identity, which is common for extensions published by individual developers rather than large organizations, and does not by itself signal a problem. Combined with the developer’s declared privacy practices—stating data is not sold or used for unrelated purposes—the overall profile suggests a well-kept tool with a reasonable permission set.

AI-assisted analysis of the documented signals above (permissions, store data, privacy practices) — explains what they mean and the risks typical for this category. Not a hands-on test.

What the store listing shows

Selection Reader (Text to Speech) listing on the Chrome Web Store
Selection Reader (Text to Speech) on the Chrome Web Store, captured 2026-10-24. View the live listing ↗

Who's Behind Selection Reader (Text to Speech)?

  • Publisher David Heaney

Public records identify the publisher, but no individual founders or a separate registered company are named — which is what holds the Publisher & Identity score back. Less public information about who operates an extension means less you can verify about their long-term accountability.

How it compares

Among the 838 browser extensions we track, Selection Reader (Text to Speech) scores higher on safety than 82% of them.

Computed from our own database of assessed browser extensions — updated as we track more.

Evidence on File (12)

Founder public: Publisher publicly identified: David Heaney (individual founders not separately named).
Our reports database · Captured 2026-10-18
Registered company: David Heaney.
Our reports database · Captured 2026-10-18
Data collection scope: Developer lists no user-data categories collected on the store privacy disclosure.
Data not sold: Developer declares on the Chrome Web Store that your data is not sold to third parties.
Data use limited: Developer declares data isn't used for unrelated purposes or to determine creditworthiness/lending.
Privacy policy present: No privacy policy is linked from the store listing.
High-capability permissions: Requests 1 high-capability permission(s): scripting.
Website access scope: Requests no host access — cannot read or change data on the websites you visit.
Manifest version: Built on Manifest V3 (the modern, more sandboxed permission model).
Last updated recency: Last updated on the store 2026-09-07.
Store rating: Store rating 4.2/5 from 730 user ratings.
Store users: 200,000 active users/installs reported on the store.

Selection Reader (Text to Speech) FAQ

Is Selection Reader (Text to Speech) safe?
Selection Reader (Text to Speech) earns a safety grade of A (84.8/100) on our evidence-based assessment, based on 5 of 5 safety dimensions we could verify from public records. This is an automated profile built from public records, not a hands-on review.
Who is behind Selection Reader (Text to Speech)?
Selection Reader (Text to Speech) is operated by David Heaney.

Browse all browser extensions we've checked →

Share 𝕏 Reddit Facebook

Cite this profile: Is Selection Reader (Text to Speech) safe? — ExtensionTrust. ExtensionTrust. https://extensiontrust.com/tool/selection-reader-text-to-speech/

Get browser-extension safety alerts