Is Picture in Picture - PiP View Safe? — Extension Safety Profile
Quick verdict: Picture in Picture - PiP View earns a safety grade B, 72.7 out of 100, based on 5 of 5 dimensions.
72.7/100
Grade B · 5 of 5 checks
What we found
Automated safety profile from public signals (the extension's manifest & permissions, store listing, publisher, privacy policy). A full review hasn't been published yet.
What this safety grade means
Picture in Picture - PiP View earns a safety grade of B (72.7/100), measured across 5 of 5 dimensions. Its strongest area is Maintenance & Ownership (100%). The weakest is Publisher & Identity (60%) — what holds its grade back the most.
On the public records we can check, Picture in Picture - PiP View looks broadly trustworthy. 60,000 active users/installs reported on the store. Store rating 3.9/5 from 54 user ratings. Last updated on the store 2026-03-01. This is an automated profile, not a hands-on review — so treat the grade as a starting point: open Picture in Picture - PiP View's own store listing and privacy policy before installing, and weigh it against the other browser extensions we track below.
Safety Signals
Based on 5 of 5 safety dimensions
| Dimension | Score | Bar | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Publisher & Identity | 60% · 4.8/8 pts | Automated signals | |
| Permissions & Access | 65% · 16.2/25 pts | Automated signals | |
| Data & Privacy | 83% · 13.2/16 pts | Automated signals | |
| Maintenance & Ownership | 100% · 7.5/7.5 pts | Automated signals | |
| Community Reputation | 66% · 6.6/10 pts | Automated signals |
In-depth safety analysis
This extension requests broad access to all websites (*://*/*) and scripting abilities, which allows it to read and modify page content on
AI-assisted analysis of the documented signals above (permissions, store data, privacy practices) — explains what they mean and the risks typical for this category. Not a hands-on test.
What the store listing shows
Who's Behind Picture in Picture - PiP View?
- Publisher lunu.bounir
Public records identify the publisher, but no individual founders or a separate registered company are named — which is what holds the Publisher & Identity score back. Less public information about who operates an extension means less you can verify about their long-term accountability.
How it compares
Among the 345 browser extensions we track, Picture in Picture - PiP View scores higher on safety than 34% of them.
Computed from our own database of assessed browser extensions — updated as we track more.
Evidence on File (12)
Picture in Picture - PiP View FAQ
- Is Picture in Picture - PiP View safe?
- Picture in Picture - PiP View earns a safety grade of B (72.7/100) on our evidence-based assessment, based on 5 of 5 safety dimensions we could verify from public records. This is an automated profile built from public records, not a hands-on review.
- Who is behind Picture in Picture - PiP View?
- Picture in Picture - PiP View is operated by lunu.bounir.
Browse all browser extensions we've checked →