Is Picture-in-Picture any site Safe? — Extension Safety Profile

Quick verdict: Picture-in-Picture any site earns a safety grade B, 76.7 out of 100, based on 5 of 5 dimensions.

B

76.7/100

Grade B · 5 of 5 checks


What we found

· Data updated

Automated safety profile from public signals (the extension's manifest & permissions, store listing, publisher, privacy policy). A full review hasn't been published yet.

What this safety grade means

Picture-in-Picture any site earns a safety grade of B (76.7/100), measured across 5 of 5 dimensions. Its strongest area is Permissions & Access (90%). The weakest is Maintenance & Ownership (30%) — what holds its grade back the most.

On the public records we can check, Picture-in-Picture any site looks broadly trustworthy. 30,000 active users/installs reported on the store. Store rating 4.8/5 from 105 user ratings. Last updated on the store 2024-07-30. This is an automated profile, not a hands-on review — so treat the grade as a starting point: open Picture-in-Picture any site's own store listing and privacy policy before installing, and weigh it against the other browser extensions we track below.

Safety Signals

Based on 5 of 5 safety dimensions

DimensionScoreBarSource
Publisher & Identity 60% · 4.8/8 pts Automated signals
Permissions & Access 90% · 22.5/25 pts Automated signals
Data & Privacy 83% · 13.2/16 pts Automated signals
Maintenance & Ownership 30% · 2.3/7.5 pts Automated signals
Community Reputation 83% · 8.3/10 pts Automated signals

In-depth safety analysis

This extension requests the tabCapture, activeTab, and scripting permissions. In practice, that combination allows it to capture the video and audio stream from your current browser tab and inject code to overlay a movable picture-in-picture window on websites. For a tool designed to pop any video into a floating player, this scope is expected and necessary for its core function.

General-purpose screen or tab capturing extensions can raise a few typical considerations. Because tabCapture can access streaming media from a tab, a careful user should know that a malicious or compromised version of such an extension could theoretically record audible or visible content from that tab. Extensions that inject scripts onto pages you visit also operate with a broad view of page content, so users should be mindful of granting these abilities only to tools from clearly identified, trustworthy publishers.

Looking at the fact sheet for this extension, the Permissions & Access dimension is its strongest area, suggesting the requested APIs align well with its stated purpose and are reasonably scoped. The weakest dimension is Maintenance & Ownership, which points to factors like update cadence or publisher clarity that a cautious user may want to examine further before installing.

AI-assisted analysis of the documented signals above (permissions, store data, privacy practices) — explains what they mean and the risks typical for this category. Not a hands-on test.

What the store listing shows

Picture-in-Picture any site listing on the Chrome Web Store
Picture-in-Picture any site on the Chrome Web Store, captured 2026-07-01. View the live listing ↗

Who's Behind Picture-in-Picture any site?

  • Publisher mtsmfm

Public records identify the publisher, but no individual founders or a separate registered company are named — which is what holds the Publisher & Identity score back. Less public information about who operates an extension means less you can verify about their long-term accountability.

How it compares

Among the 345 browser extensions we track, Picture-in-Picture any site scores higher on safety than 52% of them.

Computed from our own database of assessed browser extensions — updated as we track more.

Evidence on File (12)

Founder public: Publisher publicly identified: mtsmfm (individual founders not separately named).
Our reports database · Captured 2026-06-27
Registered company: mtsmfm.
Our reports database · Captured 2026-06-27
Data collection scope: Developer lists no user-data categories collected on the store privacy disclosure.
Data not sold: Developer declares on the Chrome Web Store that your data is not sold to third parties.
Data use limited: Developer declares data isn't used for unrelated purposes or to determine creditworthiness/lending.
Privacy policy present: No privacy policy is linked from the store listing.
High-capability permissions: Requests 1 high-capability permission(s): scripting.
Website access scope: Requests no host access — cannot read or change data on the websites you visit.
Manifest version: Built on Manifest V3 (the modern, more sandboxed permission model).
Last updated recency: Last updated on the store 2024-07-30.
Store rating: Store rating 4.8/5 from 105 user ratings.
Store users: 30,000 active users/installs reported on the store.

Picture-in-Picture any site FAQ

Is Picture-in-Picture any site safe?
Picture-in-Picture any site earns a safety grade of B (76.7/100) on our evidence-based assessment, based on 5 of 5 safety dimensions we could verify from public records. This is an automated profile built from public records, not a hands-on review.
Who is behind Picture-in-Picture any site?
Picture-in-Picture any site is operated by mtsmfm.

Browse all browser extensions we've checked →

Share 𝕏 Reddit Facebook

Cite this profile: Is Picture-in-Picture any site safe? — ExtensionTrust. ExtensionTrust. https://extensiontrust.com/tool/picture-in-picture-any-site/

Get browser-extension safety alerts