Is MetaMask Safe? — Extension Safety Profile
Quick verdict: MetaMask earns a safety grade B, 69.7 out of 100, based on 5 of 5 dimensions.
69.7/100
Grade B · 5 of 5 checks
What we found
Automated safety profile from public signals (the extension's manifest & permissions, store listing, publisher, privacy policy). A full review hasn't been published yet.
What MetaMask's safety grade means
MetaMask earns a safety grade of B (69.71/100), measured across 5 of 5 dimensions. Its strongest area is Maintenance & Ownership (100%). The weakest is Permissions & Access (52%) — what holds its grade back the most.
On the public records we can check, MetaMask looks broadly trustworthy. 12,000,000 active users/installs reported on the store. Store rating 2.7/5 from 5,900 user ratings. Last updated on the store 2026-06-16 (2 days ago). This is an automated profile, not a hands-on review — so treat the grade as a starting point: open MetaMask's own store listing and privacy policy before installing, and weigh it against the other browser extensions we track below.
Safety Signals
Based on 5 of 5 safety dimensions
| Dimension | Score | Bar | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Publisher & Identity | 60% · 8/20 pts assessed | Automated signals | |
| Permissions & Access | 52% · of 25 pts | Automated signals | |
| Data & Privacy | 93% · 16/20 pts assessed | Automated signals | |
| Maintenance & Ownership | 100% · 7.5/15 pts assessed | Automated signals | |
| Community Reputation | 64% · 10/20 pts assessed | Automated signals |
In-depth safety analysis
MetaMask is a well-known cryptocurrency wallet that manages digital assets and interacts with decentralized applications. To do this, it requests a broad set of permissions. The host access to all websites, local files, and local network ports like localhost:8545 allows it to inject its wallet interface into any page and communicate with local blockchain nodes or apps. Permissions like scripting, webRequest, and cookies let it modify or monitor network activity, while clipboardWrite can handle copying addresses. This is a powerful but expected scope for a wallet that must connect to every site a user visits.
For any crypto wallet extension, the main safety concern is that its extensive access makes it a prime target for phishing and impersonation. Users should always verify they are installing the authentic extension from the official store listing and be cautious of fake versions that look identical. The ability to read and write data on all websites means a compromised wallet could expose seed phrases or alter transactions, so keeping the extension updated and practicing good security hygiene is essential.
Looking at the fact sheet, the strongest dimension is Maintenance & Ownership, reflecting a well-maintained and actively updated product. The weakest is Permissions & Access, which is not surprising given the deep system integration a wallet requires but does lower the score due to the inherent risk of such broad access. The publisher's declared privacy practices state they collect user activity data and do not sell it, which aligns with the high Data & Privacy score.
AI-assisted analysis of the documented signals above (permissions, store data, privacy practices) — explains what they mean and the risks typical for this category. Not a hands-on test.
What MetaMask's store listing shows
Who's Behind MetaMask?
- Publisher Consensys Software Inc.
How MetaMask compares
Among the 48 browser extensions we track, MetaMask scores higher on safety than 23% of them.
Computed from our own database of assessed browser extensions — updated as we track more.
Evidence on File (12)
MetaMask FAQ
- Is MetaMask safe?
- MetaMask earns a safety grade of B (69.7/100) on our evidence-based assessment, based on 5 of 5 safety dimensions we could verify from public records. This is an automated profile built from public records, not a hands-on review.
- Who is behind MetaMask?
- MetaMask is operated by Consensys Software Inc..