Is Image Editor for Google Chrome Safe? — Extension Safety Profile

Quick verdict: Image Editor for Google Chrome earns a safety grade A, 84.6 out of 100, based on 5 of 5 dimensions.

A

84.6/100

Grade A · 5 of 5 checks


What we found

· Data updated

Automated safety profile from public signals (the extension's manifest & permissions, store listing, publisher, privacy policy). A full review hasn't been published yet.

What this safety grade means

Image Editor for Google Chrome earns a safety grade of A (84.6/100), measured across 5 of 5 dimensions. Its strongest area is Maintenance & Ownership (100%). The weakest is Community Reputation (57%) — what holds its grade back the most.

On the public records we can check, Image Editor for Google Chrome comes through cleanly. 10,000 active users/installs reported on the store. Store rating 3.4/5 from 38 user ratings. Last updated on the store 2026-08-19. This is an automated profile, not a hands-on review — so treat the grade as a starting point: open Image Editor for Google Chrome's own store listing and privacy policy before installing, and weigh it against the other browser extensions we track below.

Safety Signals

Based on 5 of 5 safety dimensions

DimensionScoreBarSource
Publisher & Identity 60% · 4.8/8 pts 2 of 5 checks verified Automated signals
Permissions & Access 100% · 25/25 pts 3 of 3 checks verified Automated signals
Data & Privacy 83% · 13.2/16 pts 4 of 5 checks verified Automated signals
Maintenance & Ownership 100% · 7.5/7.5 pts 1 of 2 checks verified Automated signals
Community Reputation 57% · 5.8/10 pts 2 of 4 checks verified Automated signals

In-depth safety analysis

This extension requests only three permissions: contextMenus, storage, and activeTab. That means it can add options to Chrome's right‑click menu, save settings locally, and interact with the current page’s content—but only when you explicitly activate it, for example by clicking its toolbar icon or using the context menu entry. For an image editor, this is a focused and privacy‑respecting permission set; it does not ask for broad access to all websites or persistent background data collection.

General‑purpose image editing extensions typically need temporary access to the page you want to edit. As with any extension that can read or modify page content, a cautious user should be mindful of its origin. While there is no indication of misuse here, it is good practice to check recent reviews, review the publisher, and avoid using such tools on sensitive pages (e.g., banking sites) unless necessary. The developer’s stated privacy practices claim data is not sold or used for unrelated purposes, which aligns with the limited permissions.

The strongest dimension in this assessment is Maintenance & Ownership (100%), reflecting a recent update and active upkeep—a positive sign for long‑term reliability. The weakest is Community Reputation (57%), likely influenced by a modest rating of 3.4 out of 5 and a relatively small number of reviews. Users may want to skim feedback for any recurring concerns, but this alone is not unusual for a utility extension.

AI-assisted analysis of the documented signals above (permissions, store data, privacy practices) — explains what they mean and the risks typical for this category. Not a hands-on test.

What the store listing shows

Image Editor for Google Chrome listing on the Chrome Web Store
Image Editor for Google Chrome on the Chrome Web Store, captured 2026-10-14. View the live listing ↗

Who's Behind Image Editor for Google Chrome?

  • Publisher Free Software Extensions

Public records identify the publisher, but no individual founders or a separate registered company are named — which is what holds the Publisher & Identity score back. Less public information about who operates an extension means less you can verify about their long-term accountability.

How it compares

Among the 838 browser extensions we track, Image Editor for Google Chrome scores higher on safety than 80% of them.

Computed from our own database of assessed browser extensions — updated as we track more.

Evidence on File (12)

Founder public: Publisher publicly identified: Free Software Extensions (individual founders not separately named).
Our reports database · Captured 2026-10-20
Registered company: Free Software Extensions.
Our reports database · Captured 2026-10-20
Data collection scope: Developer lists no user-data categories collected on the store privacy disclosure.
Data not sold: Developer declares on the Chrome Web Store that your data is not sold to third parties.
Data use limited: Developer declares data isn't used for unrelated purposes or to determine creditworthiness/lending.
Privacy policy present: No privacy policy is linked from the store listing.
High-capability permissions: Requests no high-capability permissions in its manifest.
Website access scope: Requests no host access — cannot read or change data on the websites you visit.
Manifest version: Built on Manifest V3 (the modern, more sandboxed permission model).
Last updated recency: Last updated on the store 2026-08-19.
Store rating: Store rating 3.4/5 from 38 user ratings.
Store users: 10,000 active users/installs reported on the store.

Image Editor for Google Chrome FAQ

Is Image Editor for Google Chrome safe?
Image Editor for Google Chrome earns a safety grade of A (84.6/100) on our evidence-based assessment, based on 5 of 5 safety dimensions we could verify from public records. This is an automated profile built from public records, not a hands-on review.
Who is behind Image Editor for Google Chrome?
Image Editor for Google Chrome is operated by Free Software Extensions.

Browse all browser extensions we've checked →

Share 𝕏 Reddit Facebook

Cite this profile: Is Image Editor for Google Chrome safe? — ExtensionTrust. ExtensionTrust. https://extensiontrust.com/tool/image-editor-for-google-chrome/

Get browser-extension safety alerts