Is Hulu Picture In Picture [QVI] Safe? — Extension Safety Profile

Quick verdict: Hulu Picture In Picture [QVI] earns a safety grade A, 82.9 out of 100, based on 5 of 5 dimensions.

A

82.9/100

Grade A · 5 of 5 checks


What we found

· Data updated

Automated safety profile from public signals (the extension's manifest & permissions, store listing, publisher, privacy policy). A full review hasn't been published yet.

What this safety grade means

Hulu Picture In Picture [QVI] earns a safety grade of A (82.9/100), measured across 5 of 5 dimensions. Its strongest area is Permissions & Access (95%). The weakest is Publisher & Identity (60%) — what holds its grade back the most.

On the public records we can check, Hulu Picture In Picture [QVI] comes through cleanly. 20,000 active users/installs reported on the store. Store rating 4.2/5 from 93 user ratings. Last updated on the store 2026-04-03. This is an automated profile, not a hands-on review — so treat the grade as a starting point: open Hulu Picture In Picture [QVI]'s own store listing and privacy policy before installing, and weigh it against the other browser extensions we track below.

Safety Signals

Based on 5 of 5 safety dimensions

DimensionScoreBarSource
Publisher & Identity 60% · 4.8/8 pts 2 of 5 checks verified Automated signals
Permissions & Access 95% · 23.7/25 pts 3 of 3 checks verified Automated signals
Data & Privacy 80% · 12.8/16 pts 4 of 5 checks verified Automated signals
Maintenance & Ownership 85% · 6.4/7.5 pts 1 of 2 checks verified Automated signals
Community Reputation 74% · 7.4/10 pts 2 of 4 checks verified Automated signals

In-depth safety analysis

This extension requests access to Hulu’s website (*://*.hulu.com/*) along with the alarms and storage API permissions. That host permission allows it to read and modify content on Hulu pages, which is expected for a picture-in-picture tool that needs to interact with the video player. The scope is typical for a single-site enhancement, and the permissions are narrowly focused on its stated purpose.

For any extension that modifies a streaming site, a careful user should consider that host access can also be used to inject scripts or track activity on that site. The developer’s privacy disclosure states it collects personally identifiable information, authentication data, location, user activity, and website content — a broader set of data than a simple PiP feature might require. While this is self-declared and not verified, it’s worth noting when deciding whether to install.

The strongest dimension in the safety assessment is Permissions & Access, reflecting that the extension asks for only what’s functionally necessary. The weakest is Publisher & Identity, indicating limited transparency about the developer behind “TheBestChromeExtensions.” A low publisher score doesn’t imply wrongdoing, but it does mean there’s less public track record to evaluate, which is a common consideration with smaller or less well-known extension authors.

AI-assisted analysis of the documented signals above (permissions, store data, privacy practices) — explains what they mean and the risks typical for this category. Not a hands-on test.

What the store listing shows

Hulu Picture In Picture [QVI] listing on the Chrome Web Store
Hulu Picture In Picture [QVI] on the Chrome Web Store, captured 2026-10-23. View the live listing ↗

Who's Behind Hulu Picture In Picture [QVI]?

  • Publisher TheBestChromeExtensions

Public records identify the publisher, but no individual founders or a separate registered company are named — which is what holds the Publisher & Identity score back. Less public information about who operates an extension means less you can verify about their long-term accountability.

How it compares

Among the 838 browser extensions we track, Hulu Picture In Picture [QVI] scores higher on safety than 74% of them.

Computed from our own database of assessed browser extensions — updated as we track more.

Evidence on File (12)

Founder public: Publisher publicly identified: TheBestChromeExtensions (individual founders not separately named).
Our reports database · Captured 2026-10-20
Registered company: TheBestChromeExtensions.
Our reports database · Captured 2026-10-20
Data collection scope: Developer discloses collecting 5 data categories (Personally identifiable information, Authentication information, Location, User activity, Website content) — a broad set.
Data not sold: Developer declares on the Chrome Web Store that your data is not sold to third parties.
Data use limited: Developer declares data isn't used for unrelated purposes or to determine creditworthiness/lending.
Privacy policy present: A privacy policy is linked from the store listing: https://thebestchromeextensions.com/privacy_policy_qvi/
High-capability permissions: Requests no high-capability permissions in its manifest.
Website access scope: Requests access only to specific sites: *://*.hulu.com/*.
Manifest version: Built on Manifest V3 (the modern, more sandboxed permission model).
Last updated recency: Last updated on the store 2026-04-03.
Store rating: Store rating 4.2/5 from 93 user ratings.
Store users: 20,000 active users/installs reported on the store.

Hulu Picture In Picture [QVI] FAQ

Is Hulu Picture In Picture [QVI] safe?
Hulu Picture In Picture [QVI] earns a safety grade of A (82.9/100) on our evidence-based assessment, based on 5 of 5 safety dimensions we could verify from public records. This is an automated profile built from public records, not a hands-on review.
Who is behind Hulu Picture In Picture [QVI]?
Hulu Picture In Picture [QVI] is operated by TheBestChromeExtensions.

Browse all browser extensions we've checked →

Share 𝕏 Reddit Facebook

Cite this profile: Is Hulu Picture In Picture [QVI] safe? — ExtensionTrust. ExtensionTrust. https://extensiontrust.com/tool/hulu-picture-in-picture-qvi/

Get browser-extension safety alerts