Is GNOME Shell integration Safe? — Extension Safety Profile

Quick verdict: GNOME Shell integration earns a safety grade B, 77.2 out of 100, based on 5 of 5 dimensions.

B

77.2/100

Grade B · 5 of 5 checks


What we found

· Data updated

Automated safety profile from public signals (the extension's manifest & permissions, store listing, publisher, privacy policy). A full review hasn't been published yet.

What this safety grade means

GNOME Shell integration earns a safety grade of B (77.2/100), measured across 5 of 5 dimensions. Its strongest area is Permissions & Access (85%). The weakest is Publisher & Identity (60%) — what holds its grade back the most.

On the public records we can check, GNOME Shell integration looks broadly trustworthy. 700,000 active users/installs reported on the store. Store rating 3.8/5 from 328 user ratings. Last updated on the store 2025-10-04. This is an automated profile, not a hands-on review — so treat the grade as a starting point: open GNOME Shell integration's own store listing and privacy policy before installing, and weigh it against the other browser extensions we track below.

Safety Signals

Based on 5 of 5 safety dimensions

DimensionScoreBarSource
Publisher & Identity 60% · 4.8/8 pts 2 of 5 checks verified Automated signals
Permissions & Access 85% · 21.2/25 pts 3 of 3 checks verified Automated signals
Data & Privacy 83% · 13.2/16 pts 4 of 5 checks verified Automated signals
Maintenance & Ownership 60% · 4.5/7.5 pts 1 of 2 checks verified Automated signals
Community Reputation 76% · 7.6/10 pts 2 of 4 checks verified Automated signals

In-depth safety analysis

This extension uses the nativeMessaging permission to communicate with a companion application installed on your operating system. This allows the browser to detect and interact with your GNOME desktop environment, which is expected for a tool that manages shell extensions. The notifications permission lets it show system alerts about extension updates, and the storage permission is used to save your preferences locally.

For general browser extensions that integrate with a desktop environment, users should be aware that nativeMessaging can pass data between the browser and a separate program on your computer. A careful user would want to ensure they have installed the companion host application from the official GNOME source. While the extension is limited to two specific host domains, extensions in this category that lose publisher control could potentially be updated to communicate elsewhere.

The fact sheet shows this extension scores highest in the Permissions & Access dimension, reflecting its narrowly scoped host access and a reasonable set of permissions for its function. The weakest dimension is Publisher & Identity, which points to less available information about the publisher’s verification or organizational standing, a signal a cautious user might consider when installing software that interacts with the host system.

AI-assisted analysis of the documented signals above (permissions, store data, privacy practices) — explains what they mean and the risks typical for this category. Not a hands-on test.

What the store listing shows

GNOME Shell integration listing on the Chrome Web Store
GNOME Shell integration on the Chrome Web Store, captured 2026-10-19. View the live listing ↗

Who's Behind GNOME Shell integration?

  • Publisher http://extensions.gnome.org/

Public records identify the publisher, but no individual founders or a separate registered company are named — which is what holds the Publisher & Identity score back. Less public information about who operates an extension means less you can verify about their long-term accountability.

How it compares

Among the 838 browser extensions we track, GNOME Shell integration scores higher on safety than 53% of them.

Computed from our own database of assessed browser extensions — updated as we track more.

Evidence on File (12)

Founder public: Publisher publicly identified: http://extensions.gnome.org/ (individual founders not separately named).
Our reports database · Captured 2026-10-14
Registered company: http://extensions.gnome.org/.
Our reports database · Captured 2026-10-14
Data collection scope: Developer lists no user-data categories collected on the store privacy disclosure.
Data not sold: Developer declares on the Chrome Web Store that your data is not sold to third parties.
Data use limited: Developer declares data isn't used for unrelated purposes or to determine creditworthiness/lending.
Privacy policy present: No privacy policy is linked from the store listing.
High-capability permissions: Requests 1 high-capability permission(s): nativemessaging.
Website access scope: Requests access only to specific sites: https://extensions.gnome.org/, https://extensions-next.gnome.org/.
Manifest version: Built on Manifest V3 (the modern, more sandboxed permission model).
Last updated recency: Last updated on the store 2025-10-04.
Store rating: Store rating 3.8/5 from 328 user ratings.
Store users: 700,000 active users/installs reported on the store.

GNOME Shell integration FAQ

Is GNOME Shell integration safe?
GNOME Shell integration earns a safety grade of B (77.2/100) on our evidence-based assessment, based on 5 of 5 safety dimensions we could verify from public records. This is an automated profile built from public records, not a hands-on review.
Who is behind GNOME Shell integration?
GNOME Shell integration is operated by http://extensions.gnome.org/.

Browse all browser extensions we've checked →

Share 𝕏 Reddit Facebook

Cite this profile: Is GNOME Shell integration safe? — ExtensionTrust. ExtensionTrust. https://extensiontrust.com/tool/gnome-shell-integration/

Get browser-extension safety alerts