Is Fake Filler Safe? — Extension Safety Profile

Quick verdict: Fake Filler earns a safety grade A, 80.6 out of 100, based on 5 of 5 dimensions.

A

80.6/100

Grade A · 5 of 5 checks


What we found

· Data updated

Automated safety profile from public signals (the extension's manifest & permissions, store listing, publisher, privacy policy). A full review hasn't been published yet.

What this safety grade means

Fake Filler earns a safety grade of A (80.6/100), measured across 5 of 5 dimensions. Its strongest area is Community Reputation (93%). The weakest is Maintenance & Ownership (30%) — what holds its grade back the most.

On the public records we can check, Fake Filler comes through cleanly. 400,000 active users/installs reported on the store. Store rating 4.4/5 from 794 user ratings. Last updated on the store 2024-08-03. This is an automated profile, not a hands-on review — so treat the grade as a starting point: open Fake Filler's own store listing and privacy policy before installing, and weigh it against the other browser extensions we track below.

Safety Signals

Based on 5 of 5 safety dimensions

DimensionScoreBarSource
Publisher & Identity 60% · 4.8/8 pts 2 of 5 checks verified Automated signals
Permissions & Access 90% · 22.5/25 pts 3 of 3 checks verified Automated signals
Data & Privacy 93% · 14.8/16 pts 4 of 5 checks verified Automated signals
Maintenance & Ownership 30% · 2.3/7.5 pts 1 of 2 checks verified Automated signals
Community Reputation 93% · 9.3/10 pts 2 of 4 checks verified Automated signals

In-depth safety analysis

The extension requests the contextMenus, activeTab, storage, and scripting permissions. This allows it to add right‑click menu items, access the current web page only when you invoke it (e.g., by clicking its icon or a context menu), save settings locally, and inject scripts to fill forms with fake data. For a form‑filling utility, this permission set is focused and less invasive than blanket site access; the activeTab and scripting permissions limit its reach to pages you explicitly act on.

General extensions that interact with form fields can, by design, read and modify page content. Fake Filler’s developer‑declared privacy practices note that it collects personally identifiable information and authentication information. While that could be required for a companion account or syncing feature, a careful user should consider why a local fake‑data filler needs to gather such data. The category itself carries the standard risk that an extension might misuse form‑access capabilities, so it is wise to review the privacy declaration and stay alert after updates.

Community Reputation is the strongest dimension (93%), reflecting positive user feedback and a large number of installs. In contrast, Maintenance & Ownership scored only 30%, suggesting potential concerns about the transparency of the publisher’s identity or the responsiveness to future security patches. This imbalance means the extension is well‑liked today, but its long‑term maintenance posture deserves attention.

AI-assisted analysis of the documented signals above (permissions, store data, privacy practices) — explains what they mean and the risks typical for this category. Not a hands-on test.

What the store listing shows

Fake Filler listing on the Chrome Web Store
Fake Filler on the Chrome Web Store, captured 2026-06-24. View the live listing ↗

Who's Behind Fake Filler?

  • Publisher fakefiller.com

Public records identify the publisher, but no individual founders or a separate registered company are named — which is what holds the Publisher & Identity score back. Less public information about who operates an extension means less you can verify about their long-term accountability.

How it compares

Among the 838 browser extensions we track, Fake Filler scores higher on safety than 65% of them.

Computed from our own database of assessed browser extensions — updated as we track more.

Evidence on File (12)

Founder public: Publisher publicly identified: fakefiller.com (individual founders not separately named).
Our reports database · Captured 2026-06-23
Registered company: fakefiller.com.
Our reports database · Captured 2026-06-23
Data collection scope: Developer discloses collecting 2 data category (Personally identifiable information, Authentication information).
Source: fakefiller.com ↗ · Captured 2026-06-23
Data not sold: Developer declares on the Chrome Web Store that your data is not sold to third parties.
Source: fakefiller.com ↗ · Captured 2026-06-23
Data use limited: Developer declares data isn't used for unrelated purposes or to determine creditworthiness/lending.
Source: fakefiller.com ↗ · Captured 2026-06-23
Privacy policy present: A privacy policy is linked from the store listing: https://fakefiller.com/privacy
Source: fakefiller.com ↗ · Captured 2026-06-23
High-capability permissions: Requests 1 high-capability permission(s): scripting.
Website access scope: Requests no host access — cannot read or change data on the websites you visit.
Manifest version: Built on Manifest V3 (the modern, more sandboxed permission model).
Last updated recency: Last updated on the store 2024-08-03.
Store rating: Store rating 4.4/5 from 794 user ratings.
Store users: 400,000 active users/installs reported on the store.

Fake Filler FAQ

Is Fake Filler safe?
Fake Filler earns a safety grade of A (80.6/100) on our evidence-based assessment, based on 5 of 5 safety dimensions we could verify from public records. This is an automated profile built from public records, not a hands-on review.
Who is behind Fake Filler?
Fake Filler is operated by fakefiller.com.

Browse all browser extensions we've checked →

Share 𝕏 Reddit Facebook

Cite this profile: Is Fake Filler safe? — ExtensionTrust. ExtensionTrust. https://extensiontrust.com/tool/fake-filler/

Get browser-extension safety alerts