Is Clipboard History Manager - Secure, Fast, and Open Source Safe? — Extension Safety Profile
Quick verdict: Clipboard History Manager - Secure, Fast, and Open Source earns a safety grade A, 84.5 out of 100, based on 5 of 5 dimensions.
84.5/100
Grade A · 5 of 5 checks
What we found
Automated safety profile from public signals (the extension's manifest & permissions, store listing, publisher, privacy policy). A full review hasn't been published yet.
What this safety grade means
Clipboard History Manager - Secure, Fast, and Open Source earns a safety grade of A (84.5/100), measured across 5 of 5 dimensions. Its strongest area is Maintenance & Ownership (100%). The weakest is Publisher & Identity (60%) — what holds its grade back the most.
On the public records we can check, Clipboard History Manager - Secure, Fast, and Open Source comes through cleanly. 10,000 active users/installs reported on the store. Store rating 4.6/5 from 54 user ratings. Last updated on the store 2026-06-13. This is an automated profile, not a hands-on review — so treat the grade as a starting point: open Clipboard History Manager - Secure, Fast, and Open Source's own store listing and privacy policy before installing, and weigh it against the other productivity extensions we track below.
Safety Signals
Based on 5 of 5 safety dimensions
| Dimension | Score | Bar | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Publisher & Identity | 60% · 4.8/8 pts | Automated signals | |
| Permissions & Access | 83% · 20.8/25 pts | Automated signals | |
| Data & Privacy | 93% · 14.8/16 pts | Automated signals | |
| Maintenance & Ownership | 100% · 7.5/7.5 pts | Automated signals | |
| Community Reputation | 83% · 8.3/10 pts | Automated signals |
In-depth safety analysis
This extension requests a set of permissions that are largely expected for a clipboard history manager. It can read and write your system clipboard at any time, store unlimited data locally, add options to the right-click menu, and open a dedicated side panel. The scripting and activeTab permissions allow it to interact with the content of the current webpage when you activate the extension, which might be used to paste copied text into form fields. While this scope is common for its category, it also means the extension can access everything you copy—including passwords or financial details—so a privacy-conscious user should understand the level of trust involved.
Safety considerations for this type of tool centre on the sensitivity of clipboard data. The developer declares they collect personally identifiable information, even though they state it is not sold or used for unrelated purposes. Given what you copy may be highly private, it is wise to check if such data collection is truly necessary. The fact sheet shows strong maintenance and good community ratings, which suggests the extension is actively updated and generally well-regarded by users.
The weakest assessment dimension is Publisher & Identity, indicating less publicly available information about the developer. This does not mean the extension is unsafe, but users who prioritize transparency may want to visit the publisher’s website or research its background further. On the other hand, the Maintenance & Ownership dimension scored a perfect 100%, pointing to consistent updates and no apparent ownership risks—a reassuring signal for an extension that handles sensitive data.
AI-assisted analysis of the documented signals above (permissions, store data, privacy practices) — explains what they mean and the risks typical for this category. Not a hands-on test.
What the store listing shows
Who's Behind Clipboard History Manager - Secure, Fast, and Open Source?
- Publisher clipboardhistory.io
Public records identify the publisher, but no individual founders or a separate registered company are named — which is what holds the Publisher & Identity score back. Less public information about who operates an extension means less you can verify about their long-term accountability.
How it compares
Among the 25 Productivity extensions we track, Clipboard History Manager - Secure, Fast, and Open Source scores higher on safety than 88% of them.
Computed from our own database of assessed Productivity extensions — updated as we track more.
Evidence on File (12)
Clipboard History Manager - Secure, Fast, and Open Source FAQ
- Is Clipboard History Manager - Secure, Fast, and Open Source safe?
- Clipboard History Manager - Secure, Fast, and Open Source earns a safety grade of A (84.5/100) on our evidence-based assessment, based on 5 of 5 safety dimensions we could verify from public records. This is an automated profile built from public records, not a hands-on review.
- Who is behind Clipboard History Manager - Secure, Fast, and Open Source?
- Clipboard History Manager - Secure, Fast, and Open Source is operated by clipboardhistory.io.
Alternatives we track
Compare Clipboard History Manager - Secure, Fast, and Open Source head-to-head:
- Clipboard History Manager - Secure, Fast, and Open Source vs Notes: Keep Sticky Thoughts in Google Drive — safety comparison
- Clipboard History Manager - Secure, Fast, and Open Source vs Super Simple Highlighter — safety comparison
- Clipboard History Manager - Secure, Fast, and Open Source vs Anywhere stickers - simple sticky notes — safety comparison
Browse all browser extensions we've checked → · Best Productivity extensions