Is ASIFY Safe? — Extension Safety Profile
Quick verdict: ASIFY earns a safety grade B, 78.3 out of 100, based on 5 of 5 dimensions.
78.3/100
Grade B · 5 of 5 checks
What we found
Automated safety profile from public signals (the extension's manifest & permissions, store listing, publisher, privacy policy). A full review hasn't been published yet.
What this safety grade means
ASIFY earns a safety grade of B (78.3/100), measured across 5 of 5 dimensions. Its strongest area is Maintenance & Ownership (100%). The weakest is Publisher & Identity (60%) — what holds its grade back the most.
On the public records we can check, ASIFY looks broadly trustworthy. 30,000 active users/installs reported on the store. Store rating 3.8/5 from 140 user ratings. Last updated on the store 2026-09-28. This is an automated profile, not a hands-on review — so treat the grade as a starting point: open ASIFY's own store listing and privacy policy before installing, and weigh it against the other browser extensions we track below.
Safety Signals
Based on 5 of 5 safety dimensions
| Dimension | Score | Bar | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Publisher & Identity | 60% · 4.8/8 pts 2 of 5 checks verified | Automated signals | |
| Permissions & Access | 78% · 19.6/25 pts 3 of 3 checks verified | Automated signals | |
| Data & Privacy | 85% · 13.6/16 pts 4 of 5 checks verified | Automated signals | |
| Maintenance & Ownership | 100% · 7.5/7.5 pts 1 of 2 checks verified | Automated signals | |
| Community Reputation | 66% · 6.6/10 pts 2 of 4 checks verified | Automated signals |
In-depth safety analysis
The extension requests broad permissions including cookies, tabs, and host access to all AliExpress pages. This lets it read and inject content on that shopping site, access your AliExpress session cookies, and view your open tabs. For a tool that likely offers deals, coupons, or price tracking, such access is typical, but it also means the extension can see sensitive information like account details or purchase history.
Shopping assistants in the browser generally carry the risk of modifying affiliate links, tracking browsing behaviour, and potentially exposing account credentials if the extension is compromised. The developer states that it collects web history, user activity, and website content—even if not sold, that is a wide data scope. Users should be aware that any extension reading cookies on a retail site could capture session tokens, so it requires trust beyond a typical utility.
In the safety assessment, Maintenance & Ownership (100%) is the strongest dimension, indicating the extension is well maintained and clearly owned, which reduces the chance of abandonment or supply‑chain neglect. The weakest dimension is Publisher & Identity (60%), suggesting limited public information about the developer's background. Combined with a moderate community reputation (66%), this means a careful user might want to research the publisher before allowing such deep AliExpress access.
AI-assisted analysis of the documented signals above (permissions, store data, privacy practices) — explains what they mean and the risks typical for this category. Not a hands-on test.
What the store listing shows
Who's Behind ASIFY?
- Publisher asify.tools
Public records identify the publisher, but no individual founders or a separate registered company are named — which is what holds the Publisher & Identity score back. Less public information about who operates an extension means less you can verify about their long-term accountability.
How it compares
Among the 838 browser extensions we track, ASIFY scores higher on safety than 58% of them.
Computed from our own database of assessed browser extensions — updated as we track more.
Evidence on File (12)
ASIFY FAQ
- Is ASIFY safe?
- ASIFY earns a safety grade of B (78.3/100) on our evidence-based assessment, based on 5 of 5 safety dimensions we could verify from public records. This is an automated profile built from public records, not a hands-on review.
- Who is behind ASIFY?
- ASIFY is operated by asify.tools.
Browse all browser extensions we've checked →